The Literary Apologetic
Literary Theology • Argument

The Soma and the Soul: Huxley and Suffering Engineered Away

A covering never needed because the exposure it would answer has been removed at the root

Aldous Huxley

A World With No Exposure Left to Cover

Every case study examined elsewhere in this batch stages some version of exposure – a weight recognized, a nakedness registered, a denial felt as denial. The World State in Brave New World removes the precondition for that entire pattern. Genetic conditioning, soma, and manufactured contentment do not cover the citizens' nakedness; they prevent nakedness from ever registering as a problem requiring a covering at all. John the Savage, raised outside the System on a literary diet that included Shakespeare, is the only character in the novel capable of feeling the shame, longing, and moral weight the Genesis pattern describes – and the World State treats his capacity for that feeling as the pathology to be cured.

This inverts every other entry in this archive. Gilman's narrator, Goldman, Hurston's Janie all struggle within a recognized deficit toward some resolution, successful or not. Huxley's citizens have no deficit to recognize, having been engineered from before birth to feel none. The novel's horror depends on the reader recognizing what the citizens themselves cannot: that a life without the capacity to feel exposed is not a life freed from the fall's pattern but one engineered out of the capacity to notice it.

Read against the Genesis argument, Brave New World supplies this batch's most severe case – not a covering refused, imposed, or received, but the removal of the awareness that any covering was ever needed, engineered so thoroughly that only an outsider raised apart from the system can still feel what the system's own citizens have been designed never to feel.

John the Savage's Refusal

“I don't want comfort. I want God, I want poetry, I want real danger, I want freedom, I want goodness. I want sin.”

– Brave New World, 1932