Faith Seeking Understanding

The Fool Who Says There Is No God

Anselm’s ontological argument begins with Psalm 14:1: “The fool has said in his heart, there is no God.” The fool is not merely wicked but confused — his denial is self-undermining. To deny God, one must have some conception of what is being denied. And if God is that than which nothing greater can be conceived, then the fool who denies God has already admitted God into his understanding.

The question is whether the God who exists in the understanding also exists in reality — and Anselm’s argument is that a being that existed only in the understanding would not be the greatest conceivable being, since existence in reality is greater than existence in the understanding alone.

What the Proslogion Reveals

The Proslogion is structured as a prayer. Before the argument begins, Anselm addresses God directly, confessing his need and his inadequacy. This is not a rhetorical device but a theological commitment: the knowledge of God is not available to a detached observer but only to one who comes as a creature before its Creator.

The Seed of the Woman

Genesis 3:15 describes a conflict between two modes of relating to reality: one that acknowledges the Creator and one that does not. The serpent’s temptation was precisely the temptation of autonomous reason — “you shall be like God, knowing good and evil” without reference to God.

Anselm’s method — faith seeking understanding — is a direct counter to this trajectory. It insists that reason reaches its full height not in independence from faith but in service to it.

Leave a Comment